Vendor case studies: 17 sourced coding agent stories
Stories published by the company selling the tool, or a company it owns. Read the caveats on these closely. Of the 17 stories, 17 were published by a tool vendor. 11 involve an existing codebase and 3 started from scratch. Every number links to where it was published.
- Vendor-published Language port brownfield
GitHub ports the Copilot agent runtime from TypeScript to 800K+ lines of Rust, mostly by one engineer
GitHub (Microsoft) · 2026-09-16
- 832,378 lines Production Rust written
- ~430,000 lines TypeScript passed through the port (author estimate)
- ~14.5 weeks Porting window
GitHub Copilot
- Vendor-published Test migration brownfield
Asana finishes a five-year Enzyme → React Testing Library migration in two weeks with Codex
Asana · 2026-08-19
- ~2 weeks Calendar time
- ~1.5 weeks Engineering effort
- Up to 4 Parallel agents
OpenAI Codex
- Vendor-published Language port brownfield
Bun's 535,000-line Zig codebase is ported to Rust in 11 days by up to 64 parallel Claude Code agents
Bun (Oven / Anthropic) · 2026-07-08
- 535,496 lines of Zig (excluding comments), 1,448 .zig files Source size
- 11 days (May 3 to merged May 14, 2026) Time
- 6,778 Commits
Claude Code
- Vendor-published Research / benchmark brownfield
Legacy-Bench: frontier agents pass only 16.9–42.5% of COBOL, Java 7 and Fortran tasks
Factory · 2026-04-01
- 16.9%–42.5% Pass rate range (12 model–agent combos)
- >70% Same models on Terminal-Bench 2 / SWE-bench Verified
- 42.5% Best overall (GPT-5.3-Codex)
Factory Droid, OpenAI Codex, Gemini CLI
- Vendor-published New product greenfield
OpenAI team ships an internal product with zero hand-written code: ~1M lines and ~1,500 merged PRs in five months with Codex
OpenAI · 2026-02-11
- ~5 months Duration
- On the order of 1 million lines (incl. infra, tooling, docs) Codebase size
- ~1,500 PRs merged
OpenAI Codex
- Vendor-published New product greenfield
16 parallel Claude agents build a 100,000-line Rust C compiler that builds Linux, for ~$20,000
Anthropic (Nicholas Carlini) · 2026-02-05
- Just under $20,000 API cost
- ~2 weeks, nearly 2,000 Claude Code sessions Duration
- 100,000-line compiler Output
Claude Code
- Vendor-published New product greenfield
Cursor's agent swarm writes a 1M+ line browser in about a week, and critics find it barely compiles
Cursor (Wilson Lin) · 2026-01-14
- Close to a week Duration
- 1M+ lines across ~1,000 files Output
- Hundreds of concurrent workers Agents
Cursor
- Vendor-published Refactor / maintenance brownfield
Cisco uses Codex across 15+ repos to cut build times ~20% and speed up C/C++ defect fixing
Cisco · 2026-01
- 1,500+ per month Engineering hours saved
- ~20% reduction Build time
- 10–15× increase Defect resolution throughput
OpenAI Codex
- Vendor-published Migration brownfield
Nubank uses fine-tuned Devin to split a 6M-line ETL monolith, claiming 8–12x engineering-hour efficiency
Nubank · 2024-12
- 6M+ lines, ~100,000 data-class implementations Codebase
- 18 months, 1,000+ engineers Original estimate
- 8–12x Engineering-hour efficiency
Devin
- Vendor-published Upgrade / modernisation brownfield
Amazon upgrades tens of thousands of production apps to Java 17 with Amazon Q Developer
Amazon · 2024-08-01
- Tens of thousands (Java 8/11 → 17) Applications upgraded
- 4,500+ years Development work saved (estimate)
- $260M from performance improvements Annual cost savings (estimate)
Amazon Q Developer
- Vendor-published Company rollout
Stripe rolls Claude Code out to 1,370 engineers with a zero-configuration binary
Stripe
- 1,370 Engineers with Claude Code enabled
- 2–3 months Time to produce signed enterprise binary
- 6 Coding assistants enabled at Stripe
Claude Code
- Vendor-published Language port brownfield
Stripe migrates 10,000 lines of Scala to Java in four days
Stripe
- 10,000 Lines migrated
- 4 days Actual duration
- 10 engineering weeks Manual estimate
Claude
- Vendor-published Upgrade / modernisation brownfield
Altisource modernizes 350,000 lines of legacy Java with Amazon Q Developer
Altisource
- 350,000+ lines Legacy Java modernized
- +25% (one modernization team, 'up to') Developer productivity
- ~160 → 200 Story points (3-month avg per engineer)
Amazon Q Developer
- Vendor-published Company rollout
DTCC reports 40% higher developer throughput in an Amazon Q Developer proof of concept
DTCC
- +40% average Developer throughput (POC)
- −30% average Code defects (POC)
- +5% Security scores across repos
Amazon Q Developer
- Vendor-published Company rollout
Palo Alto Networks onboards 2,000 developers to a Sourcegraph Cody + Claude coding assistant in 3 months
Palo Alto Networks
- 2,000 in 3 months Developers onboarded
- 150 developers Pilot group
- Up to +40%, average 20–25% Coding productivity
Sourcegraph Cody
- Vendor-published Language port brownfield
Wiz ports a 50,000-line Python PDF library to Go in about 20 hours with Claude Code
Wiz
- ~50,000 lines of Python (pypdf) Source size
- 18,413 lines of Go Output size
- ~20 hours (10 active development, 10 testing) Time
Claude Code
- Vendor-published Migration brownfield
Block uses Claude Fable to orchestrate code migrations of thousands of pull requests, with two humans approving every deploy
Block
- "hundreds or thousands of individual pull requests across multiple repos and millions of lines of code" Migration size
- "we might merge a thousand pull requests orchestrated by Fable" PRs per migration
- "up to dozens of smaller, more cost-effective models like Opus or Sonnet" Worker models
Buzz (Block)